Firehouse.com

Firefighting - Rescue - Firefighter Training - EMS Training -Firefighter Jobs - EMS -Rescue - Extrication - HazMat - Paramedic -

Comments

1 comments posted
The comments displayed here do not necessarily reflect the view of Firehouse staff. We do not implicitly endorse their content and reserve the right to remove objectionable materials at our own discretion.

Marketing the Fire Service

Commissioner May,
You are right on. I hope in future blogs/articles you will share ideas on how the Fire Service can market ourselves in terms the stakeholders/citizens/our taxpayers can understand; not in Fire Service lingo.

Just saying, "We're accredited, we're great" won't mean anything to Mr/Mrs. Smith. I'm a strong supporter of acccreditation as one method of professionalizing the fire service (regardless of how the service is delivered). But the marketing question that needs to be answered is, "How does being an accredited fire department help Mr/Mrs Smith understand the VALUE we bring to them individually and collectively to our communities? The old "babies will die/your house will burn down" statements don't register with our citizens. None of the many homes in several cities I've lived in has never burned, but that isn't because the fire department has done anything to impact that result. I've never called them. The Fire Dept has never saved my home.

Part of the reason the fire service is highly respected is that most citizens have no frame of referrence to compare one fire department with another. They see the pictures on the TV/Newspaper and that is their only idea about what we do. Heck, we can respond to a fire in a building that isn't contained to the area of involvement at arrival, does significant or total damage, and because we contained it to the zip code of origin, the public thinks we have done a "good job". Yet, we know we did a poor (or worse) job. We even turn tragedies of a firefighter fatality, into a "success story". "We're heros, we risk our lives for you, and made the ultimate sacrifice". Look at us with the parade of fire apparatus, the bagpipers, and the dress uniforms. Don't take my comments wrong, I hope to put the Fallen Firefighter foundation out of business, because we are no longer killing fire fighters. But killing firefighters brings no VALUE to our communities.

The public knows good customer service when (unfortunately less and less frequently) we receive great customer service at a store, restaraunt, Disney World, because we can compare it with service we have received at other such establishments. Fortunately for most of our citizens, they haven't had to experience a fire/ems call, so they don't have a frame of reference to judge our "professionalism" or level of service. We show up, we took care of their problem, there happy. We must be great.

The name "Fire Department" is part of the problem. When I was Fire Chief in Pullman, Wa., we were called "Pullman Fire Services" not Fire Department. At least we got the 'Services' part in which I think is a better refection on what we do. In most communities, fighting fire is a vey small part of what we do. "All Hazard Emergency First Responders" is too long, and doesn't mean anything to Mr/Mrs. Smith. Furthermore it is not accurate.

I'll bet that at most dinner tables across America tonight (other than perhaps at the May or Neal housholds) the topic of conversation will not be about the local Fire Department. We may be respected, but folks don't think about us or care about us, until they need help.

I always enjoy you columns/blogs. I'm sorry I rambled on, but you hit (positively I will add) a real hot button with me. I hope one day our paths will cross.

Regards,
Roger Neal
Former Fire Commissioner
Pierce County #3 - University Place, WA.

User login